Sunday, 20 March 2011

What are the conclusions of the audience feedback?

Most people were impressed with the intro at the beginning. they also liked the non-digetic music in the background. A lot of them also thought that the dialog was clear and the music matched the visual. They also thought that the tracking shots were good and the plot was interesting. Most of them thought that the ending was funny. Some people said it was too dark in the cafe scenes and would be better if we used some professional lighting or covered the windows. Another negative feedback we've received is that there was no production logo and the camera should have be more steady. According to the feedback, it would have been better if we hadn't used fake names and there were a few times when the actors looked into the camera.

If we had the chance to do it again, I would talk to the actors before shooting to make sure they don't look into the camera. I noticed that the actors occasionally look into the camera. I would also plan ahead and borrow some lighting equipment so that the lighting is better inside the cafe. At the time we didn't really have a choice so we worked with what we got ,but it would have been better if we did have better lighting. I would also make sure the camera was more steady. We used the steady cam, but i don't think we used it properly. But the shot where David is walking home and there's a close up of his face is supposed to be shaky. If we had to do it again i would also get a different cafe. I thought the location was good, but the cafe itself was a bit small and hard to work with but it was perfect because it wasn't always busy.

No comments:

Post a Comment